(FOX News) -- The "Big Three" sharks that pose the greatest threats to humans are white sharks, tiger sharks and bull sharks, according to the latest shark attack statistics and journal reports of recent shark-caused fatalities.
"Big" in this case also refers to size, helping to explain why these predatory sharks may sometimes not resist attacking humans. White sharks, for example, are the world's largest predatory fish and can grow to over 20 feet in length.
George Burgess, director of the Florida Program for Shark Research and who coined the phrase "Big Three," told Discovery News that white, tiger and bull sharks "are large species that are capable of inflicting serious injuries to a victim, are commonly found in areas where humans enter the water, and have teeth designed to shear rather than hold."
He added, "Realistically, almost any shark in the right size range, roughly six feet or greater, is a potential threat to humans because, even if a bite is not intended as a directed feeding attempt on a human, the power of the jaw and tooth morphology can lead to injury."
According to International Shark Attack File statistics compiled by Burgess and his team, white sharks have been the cause of at least 279 known attacks on humans since records were first kept on such events. 78 of those attacks were fatalities. The rest of the top 10 is as follows: tiger (101 total attacks), bull (93), Carcharhinus genus but unknown species (46), sand tiger (29), blacktip (28), bronze whaler (20), wobbegong (19), hammerhead (17) and spinner (16).
People who survive a shark attack, as well as witnesses of the attack, may not correctly identify the shark, however. Bites usually happen swiftly, leaving victims and onlookers in shock. The "Big Three" may also get mistakenly blamed because of their fame and distinctive appearance.
Burgess explained that "attacks involving easily identified species, such as white, tiger, sandtiger, hammerhead and nurse sharks, nearly always identify the attacking species, while cases involving difficult to identify species, such as requiem sharks of the genus Carcharhinus, seldom correctly identify the attacker."
Shark expert Eric Clua, a marine biologist and veterinary surgeon based in
"The first two of these are known migratory species, while the bull shark is also known to be migratory, but also spends substantial time in a localized area," he said.
Clua has conducted several autopsies on shark attack victims, and is usually able to identify the shark based on tooth marks. He recently, for example, determined that a 19-year-old surfer from
Most studies conclude that hunger is not the main motivation of white shark attacks but, in this case, Clua and colleague Dennis Reid determined that "the several strikes and the heavy loss of flesh during this attack support the hypothesis of a feeding behavior."
The researchers believe that the shark was a juvenile "still in a learning phase as a top predator." Since white shark learning can occur as a result of trial and error experience, a young shark could learn to identify humans as prey.
Burgess said that "it's highly unusual for an individual shark or other animal to repeatedly prey upon humans, but it can happen."
It doesn't happen very often, though. Burgess and others are quick to point out that a person's odds of getting killed by a shark are 1 in 3.7 million. To put that into perspective, the chances of being killed by another human, based on data from the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, are roughly 1 in 16,000.
Read more at FOX News.